The Inseparability of Cause and Effect


The Inseparability of Cause and Effect

‘What is the cause of event (A) ?”'– is the basic question of inquiry in all disciplines of science.  Investigation into ‘Causation’ dominated the whole history of philosophy:

“Causation is the most fundamental connection in the universe. Without it, there would be no science or technology. There would be no moral responsibility either, as none of our thoughts would be connected with our actions and none of our actions with any consequences. Nor would we have a system of law because blame resides only in someone having caused injury or damage”. 

(Source: Causation, a Very Short Introduction, Stephen Mumford, Oxford).

A detailed study into causation branches into many aspects ranging from investigation about whether regularity of occurrences leads to consider it as a cause. Or : is there a deterministic necessity of cause and effect, and if so, what about the problem of free will, etc.  

Other areas of inquiry about causation relate to the “transitivity thread” of causes, and goes further to ask the question of “What if” : What if a certain particular cause did not take place, how this would have affected the history of events, etc.  In addition to the mentioned inquiries, a very important question is raised about the time-sequence of events, and whether causes are simultaneous with their effect.  

 The contribution of 18th century philosopher David Hume to the study of causation offered a ground of perspectives, some of which were questioned or developed further by various sources in philosophical literature.  In Eastern philosophy, however, the concept of causation and karmic consequences is a central teaching about the way all phenomena in life and nature operate. 

Causes and Conditions

Even in relatively simple events, finding the ‘true cause’ of an event becomes difficult.  Confusion may occur between the real cause of the event - on one hand - and conditions (necessary but not sufficient) for the effect to take place.  

For example: a seed of plant necessarily requires conditions, such as moist soil to sprout from.  But in many cases, even with proper soil conditions, sprouting out of the plant does not take place.  The element of “moist soil” here is not a cause but a necessary but not-sufficient-condition. The real cause of plant’s growth is its possession of an inner program within the seed (the dna information) that drives a specific process of growth.

 The following example offers a simple explanation of what can be called a “cause”, 

and what can be referred to as “condition”:


“A problem, no matter what kind, is an effect produced by a combination of

inherent causes and external conditions. Here is a glass of water. Let’s suppose

that there is some sediment at the bottom of the glass. If you stir the contents

the water will become dirty. In this case, the sediment is the inherent cause

and the act of stirring is the external condition”.

(Source: The Buddha in Daily Life, p. 170, Richard Causton)

The mentioned example explains further the benefit of correctly attributing the Cause to the side responsible for the creation of the Effect.  

In the field of solving disputes among people, one side in a dispute may blame the other side - of being “the cause” of a problem.  For example, one accuses another that the act of “stirring the situation” was the cause of developing a tense state (similar to creating the state of murky water stirred by an external spoon).  

Nonetheless, the other side insists that in this example, the external spoon is not the cause, because no matter how hard you stir, if there was no sediment within the glass in the first place, then the water will remain clear.  

This is a metaphor for individuals not realizing that the true cause of one’s unhappiness is within themselves, and that they are merely experiencing the effect of that cause (after it has been activated by someone else, acting as an external condition).  

Taking the example of the spoon in the glass of water further, we find an interesting observation:  we observe that the murky water in the glass manifests the inseparability of Cause-Condition-Effect.  At the same moment of observation of the glass (with murky water in it), the “cause” of this event is the sediment, while the “trigger” is the condition or the action of stirring, and the “effect” is the murky water – all present in one single moment of observation.  This leads us to the principle of simultaneity of cause and effect.

Cause & Effect as an indivisible process

When we look at the process linking cause and effect as one complete process, it is then possible to see them both as an uninterrupted oneness of activity.  

The togetherness of Cause and Effect is easy to observe in simple experiment (such as in “domino effect”, where the falling over of the first piece (cause) leads to the falling over of the last piece (effect) - but in more complicated phenomena, the direct observation of this togetherness is not easy (nor even possible) to observe.  

In sophisticated processes of interactions, an initial cause may follow a “nonlinear relationship” with effects of different nature - such as in chemical reactions, or changes made in physiological or biological phenomena - too sophisticated to simplify.


The world is governed by the Law of Cause and Effect.   Whenever a cause of action is made, its latent effect has been already established by the Universal Law binding causes and effects.  

The power of this Law is absolute, that is - the link between cause and consequences is unbreakable, and unconditioned by time or location. Some effects of causes made are easy to observe, others are more complicated and nonlinear.  Nonetheless every action leads to certain consequences regardless of the complexity or duration of time required for the effect to manifest.